- Who we are
- What we do
- Take action
- Take action
- research
- Opportunity Now Research
- Women and Work - The Facts
- The Business Case for Diversity
- Business Case for Diversity Case Studies
- The Work Environment
- The Organisation
- Enhancing Organisational Practices
- CEO Perspectives
- External Research
- Orange Future Enterprise Coalition Forum
- Line Managers and Diversity
- Resources
- Take action
- Take action
Section head
23/03/07
Want a difficult job done? Then ask a woman
Source: www.cipd.co.uk
A large number of business leaders will only appoint a woman into a very senior post in times of crisis and poor performance, according to a new report from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). This leaves female leaders facing a form of hidden discrimination which leaves them more likely to fail than their male counterparts.
The CIPD commissioned Exeter University to carry out the new research, Women in the boardroom: the risks of being at the top, which exposes the hidden problem that employers face in increasing the number of women in senior jobs. Research conducted by the University of Exeter finds:
• women are more readily appointed to tough jobs that are perceived to lead to make or break outcomes in terms of career success, than men.
• in crisis situations business leaders are more inclined to open up job opportunities to women, leaving women business leaders at greater risk of failing than their male colleagues working a the same levels.
The report pulls research together that shows women are more likely to be appointed at a time when organisations experience poor performance and often set up to fail:
• Company performance leading up to the appointment of a director differs depending on the gender of the appointee: for FTSE 100 companies that appointed men to their boards of directors, share price performance was relatively stable, both before and after the appointment. However, in a time of a general financial downturn in the stock market, companies that appointed a woman had experienced consistently poor performance in the months preceding the appointment (Ryan and Haslam 2005).
• Business leaders are more likely to select the female candidate when the company's performance was said to be declining than when it was improving: a study of 83 senior managers participating in a regional Business Leaders' Forum (Haslam and Ryan 2006, Study 4). In a scenario that involved appointing a financial director to a company these business leaders were much more likely to see the female candidate as suitable for the position when the organisation was experiencing a marked downturn in performance.
• Research findings also support the notion that the glass cliff can be seen as an opportunity (Haslam and Ryan 2006): in response to a scenario involving the appointment of a financial director, business leaders believed that a risky situation was seen to provide a male candidate with a much lower quality of opportunity than a non-risky situation. However, the opposite was true for an equally qualified female candidate.
